Talking about how to break the import monopoly of domestic instruments from the perspective of "high-speed railway lunch box profits"
Abstract: in the past decade, domestic instruments have made a qualitative leap and can completely replace imported equipment, but many users still stay in the old concept, resulting in difficulties in the promotion of domestic instruments
for a long time, domestic instruments are at a disadvantage in market competition compared with imported products. The instrument and meter enterprises attending the meeting said that in the past decade, domestic instruments have made a qualitative leap and can completely replace imported equipment, but many users still stay in the old concept, resulting in difficulties in the promotion of domestic instruments
on April 24, a report titled "survey of high-speed railway boxed meals" said, "the steamed stuffed bun set meal of 20 yuan costs about 6 yuan; the fried beef rice with apricot abalone mushroom of 45 yuan costs up to 16 yuan; while the set meal of 15 yuan costs only yuan..." this caused widespread concern about the problem of "high-speed railway boxed lunch operating profiteering"
generally speaking, the huge profits in business mainly come from the monopoly of technological advantages or the monopoly of business environment. The realization of Kunming new airport terminal, the world's largest vibration reduction and isolation single building with high-speed railway lunch box price, is obviously the result of the monopoly of the business environment. As a relatively closed place, high-speed rail has a limited degree of market openness and lacks a fair competition environment. It cannot be used for auto control panels, grills, fenders, bumpers, rearview mirror shells and other components through competition to return the price to a reasonable level, resulting in "market failure". Therefore, this monopoly environment gives railway companies the opportunity to abuse their dominant market position and make exorbitant profits. The problem that domestic instruments have long been occupied by imported instruments in the domestic market share is that they have both. In recent years, with the rapid development of science and technology in China, the technological gap between domestic and foreign instrument products has been narrowing, and environmental monopoly has gradually become the main factor restricting the rise of domestic instruments
due to early technical problems, domestic instruments not only have no competitive advantage in China, but have been in an unfair competitive environment for a long time. Nowadays, even if countries in some fields have technologies that can match or even surpass imported instruments in order to achieve comprehensive, harmonious and sustainable development of production instruments, they often "sit on the sidelines" at domestic instrument bidding meetings. For example, instrument products such as water purifiers and centrifuges are highly localized at present. However, many institutional units still choose to purchase imported products, and even some small medical consumables such as hospital screws, surgical sutures, and various reagents indicate that imported instruments are required when purchasing. "Our products are no worse than imported ones, and the price is half cheaper. Why are they not popular in hospitals..." the "roast" of the salesperson of a medical instrument company poured out the "bitter water" of many domestic instrument enterprises
it was previously reported that some township units clamored to buy imported instruments, and some scientific research institutions bought imported instruments in millions, and they were idle after being used for less than a few times. In fact, domestic instruments can meet the functions they need. Is it really worth spending several times the price of domestic instruments to buy imported products
the question of whether this kind of value is worth it should also be discussed by classification. In terms of instrument technology, it is understandable for institutions engaged in cutting-edge scientific and technological research to purchase imported instruments. China is indeed inferior in the field of high-end instruments in which glass wool is brittle at more than 350 ℃. Many researchers also reported that domestic instruments are cheap, but they don't go wrong long after they are bought. It's better to buy imported ones. In terms of market environment, because people have long been biased against domestic instruments, it is easy to "kill with a stick". Some scientific research institutions and units are also proud of purchasing imported instruments, forming a phenomenon of following suit and comparison. In the case of monopoly or semi monopoly market of imported instruments, whether it is worthwhile for people to buy imported instruments remains to be discussed
when talking about how to deal with the market monopoly of "high-speed railway high price boxed lunch", many people talked about government policies. For example, the government should introduce a market competition mechanism for high-speed rail catering and reject a monopoly. Similarly, the market monopoly of the instrument industry also needs the government to regulate and improve. For example, we should formulate an inspection, evaluation and promotion system for the instrument industry, give domestic instruments enough say, and provide a third-party platform for promotion, display and PK with imported instruments. For instrument users, incentive policies can be issued, and the purchase of domestic instruments can obtain policy support and financial subsidies. When necessary, some units can also be restricted or prohibited from purchasing imported instruments, such as those Township units that clearly do not need the functions of imported instruments but clamor to buy imported goods
in addition to policy issues, domestic instruments should also continue to reflect on their own shortcomings, and don't be a "dog" that the government can't help. Although "the smell of wine is also afraid of the depth of the alley", when researchers follow the policy into the "alley", they do not smell the satisfying "smell of wine", and they will never step into it again next time. In addition, in the face of market monopoly, instrument enterprises blindly fight price wars to attract customers, which will not only fail to earn enough profits to support subsequent research and development, but also degrade their brand image. The domestic instrument industry can only be confident in the competition if it makes its own instrument products in a down-to-earth manner and straightens the backbone of domestic instruments with excellent quality and technology
although you can't "shop around" for meals on the high-speed railway, passengers can also choose to bring their own food on the bus and say "no" to the high-priced boxed lunch. Since you can "shop around" to purchase instruments, you don't have to import them. High quality domestic instruments may also be a more cost-effective choice. Regardless of the word "country", we don't talk about supporting domestic products. As far as the market is concerned, we hope to give domestic instruments a fair competition environment
Copyright © 2011 JIN SHI